Apple Supplier LG reveals a new Smartwatch Battery offering more Power
The Tablet Market Needs Fresh Innovation to Restart Growth

Apple Sued over the iPhone not being licensed to use LG's LTE Patents


A non-practicing entity by the name of Evolved Wireless LLC has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Apple over the lack of a license for a series of LTE patents that are part of the LTE standard. It's hard to believe that LG Electronics would ever sell their "standard essential" patent portfolio without some kind of backdoor to maximizing their intellectual property profits. Although Evolved Wireless has filed four separate cases against Microsoft, Samsung, HTC and Lenovo using the same patents, surely LG Electronics must have known that Evolve intended to use these patents against their display partner Apple. What a tangled web they've weaved. After being on the receiving end of NPE and competitor infringement suits many times, it appears that LG has decided to take a different approach to enforcing their LTE patents on smartphone makers. Will this tactic work? Only time will tell.


Case Background


In the Evolved Wireless case before the court against Apple, they began their argument by providing a "background" of their case that focused on the Third Generation Partnership Project ("3GPP") which develops standards for globally-applicable commercial cellular systems.


They noted that "The 3GPP standards for cellular wireless communications are known as Releases. Release 8 describes the first version of the Long Term Evolution ("LTE") standard. The LTE standard network includes Evolved Universal Terrestrial Access Network ("E- UTRAN") and a Core Network called Evolved Packet Core."


They further noted that "3GPP participants must abide by the intellectual property rights ("IPR") policy of the Organizational Partners to which they belong. These IPR policies, such as the ETSI IPR policy, are intended to strike "a balance between the needs of standardization for public use in the field of telecommunications and the rights of the owners of IPRs. IPR holders whether members of ETSI and their AFFILIATES or third parties, should be adequately and fairly rewarded for the use of their IPRs in the implementation of STANDARDS and TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS."


According to the complaint, "Evolved Wireless owns, through assignments originating with LG Electronics, Inc. ("LG"), a standard-essential patent portfolio relating to LTE wireless communication systems. The portfolio, which includes United States Patent Nos. 7,746,916, 7,768,965, 7,809,373, 7,881,236, and 8,218,481 (collectively referred to herein as "LTE Patent Portfolio"), is essential to the 3GPP 36 Series technical specifications, including at least TS 36.211, .300, 321, .331, and .423.


As an ETSI member, LG extensively participated in 3GPP Working Group meetings to develop the LTE standards. LG submitted numerous proposals for incorporation into the standards, and LG's research and development efforts solved significant technical challenges facing the standards. The LTE Patent Portfolio claims several of LG's technical solutions that solve technical challenges in wireless telecommunications technology."


Apple using LG's LTE Patents


Apple sells, manufactures, imports, and uses certain devices that practice the LTE standards established by ETSI and 3GPP. Indeed, Apple markets to the public that certain devices are compliant with the LTE standard. (iPhone User Guide, at pg. 188.)


Apple, or its subsidiaries, is a member of ETSI, and was a member during the relevant period when LG declared the LTE Patent Portfolio to ETSI.


The 3GPP Working Group meetings evaluated competing technologies that could best serve the essential functions necessary to standardize wireless communications. Upon information and belief, Apple has not participated in the 3GPP Working Group meetings, although Apple has taken advantage of the system and has been successful in the LTE device market.


Licensing Dispute


On November 4, 2014, Evolved Wireless sent Jayna Whitt, Director of IP Transactions at Apple, a letter offering to engage in licensing discussions on FRAND terms for Evolved Wireless's LTE Patent Portfolio. Evolved Wireless further sent e-mails on November 4 and November 13, 2014 to open up licensing discussions. Jayna Whitt responded on November 13, 2014 identifying Heather Mewes as the point of contact.


Apple has not entered into a license agreement with Evolved Wireless for the LTE Patent Portfolio.


The Five Counts against Apple


Evolved Wireless alleges that "Apple has infringed, induced infringement, and/or contributed to infringement of the '916 Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United States, or by intending that others make, use, import into, offer for sale, or sell in the United States, products and/or methods covered by one or more claims of the '916 Patent, including but not limited to cellular telephones, tablet computers, and/or other devices with LTE capabilities and that comply with the LTE standards, including at least TS 36.211, .300, .321, .331, and .423."


The five counts of patent infringement all carry the same verbiage as noted above with the exception of the change of patent number. The patents in this case include the following: 7,746,916, 7,768,965, 7,809,373, 7,881,236, and 8,218,481.


2af evolved wireless lg patents - infringement case against apple


The patent infringement case presented in today's report was filed in the Delaware District Court, Wilmington Office, New Castle. At present, no Judge has been assigned to the case.




10. 6  PA - Notice BarPatently Apple presents only a brief summary of certain legal cases/ lawsuits which are part of the public record for journalistic news purposes. Readers are cautioned that Patently Apple does not offer a legal opinion on the merit of the case. A lawyer should be consulted for any further details or analysis. About Comments: Patently Apple reserves the right to post, dismiss or edit comments. See our Legal Archives for other patent infringement cases.




The comments to this entry are closed.