Walker Digital of Priceline.com Sues Apple Over iPhone Feature
The first of two major patent infringement lawsuits have been filed against Apple by Stanford Connecticut's Walker Digital. This heavy weight company which was behind such ventures as Priceline.com and others and originally funded by the likes of George Soros, Paul Allen and John Malone is suing Apple over its "Map + Compass" GPS based iPhone feature/app. The lawsuit which was filed against thirteen companies, singles out Apple and Google for willful infringement.
Factual Background
Walker Digital is a research and development laboratory consisting of a diverse group of innovators who study human behavior and utilize modern information technology to design novel solutions to business problems. Walker Digital has invested millions of dollars developing ground-breaking solutions to problems encountered in a wide range of industries including retail, vending, credit cards, security, gaming, educational testing, and GPS directions.
This investment was used for many things, including the development of facilities to assist with the research, development and testing of new inventions which, in turn, generated additional new solutions to problems and additional inventions. Many of these inventions have been the genesis for successful businesses, including priceline.com and Synapse, Inc.
Jay Walker, the chairman of Walker Digital, is perhaps best known as the founder of priceline.com, which brought unprecedented technology and a new level of value to the travel industry. The business processes that guide priceline.com's success were created in the invention lab of Walker Digital. Mr. Walker is named on more than 450 issued and pending U.S. and international patents, including the methods and systems described and claimed in the Asserted Patent, which revolutionizes the field of global positioning and navigation.
The Asserted Patent
On March 6, 2001, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 6,199,014 (the "'014 patent"), entitled "System for Providing Driving Directions With Visual Cues," in the names of Jay S. Walker and Toby Weir-Jones, who assigned their rights and interests in the '014 patent to Walker Digital.
The Alleged Patent Infringement In-Part
According to court documents, the complaint states the following: "Defendant Apple is infringing (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) the '014 patent by, among other things, making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling navigation instructions providing directions for traveling a route along with photographic representations of locations along a route, including, but not limited to, the iPhone with GPS and real time navigation directions and related products, which are covered by at least claims 1 and 4 of the '014 patent."
It should be specifically noted that in Walker Digital's Prayer of Relief, they deliberately single out Apple and Google out of the thirteen defendants under point (d) as follows: "A judgment that Google's and Apple's infringement was willful." A judgment of willful infringement would carry a heavier penalty, if found guilty.
The Civil Cover Sheet
The case was filed in the United States Delaware District Court. No Judge has been assigned to this case of this date.
Others listed in the Lawsuit Include: BMW of North America, LLC, Google, Inc., MapQuest, Inc., Mio Technology USA, Tom Tom Inc., Telenav, Inc., Blusens Technology S.C., NDrive, Inc, Navman Wireless Holdings, LP, Microsoft Corp., and Samsung Electronics USA, Inc..
Notice: Patently Apple presents only a brief summary of certain legal cases/ lawsuits which are part of the public record for journalistic news purposes. Readers are cautioned that Patently Apple does not offer an opinion on the merit of the case and strictly presents the allegations made in said legal cases / lawsuits. A lawyer should be consulted for any further details or analysis. About Comments: Patently Apple reserves the right to post, dismiss or edit comments. On most legal cases, comments will be closed. See our Legal Archives for other patent infringement cases.
Comments