Apple Sued for Rotating Windows on iOS Devices
Texas based Rotatable Technologies is suing Apple for infringing on a 1999 patent that they acquired titled "Display Method for Selectively Rotating Windows on a Computer Display." The lawsuit claims that Apple's iPhone and iPad tablets infringe one or more claims of their patent. Rotatable Technologies also launched a similar lawsuit against Nokia earlier this month.
For those wishing to examine Rotatable Technologies patent's claims may do so by reviewing patent 6,326,978. Patent Figure 2 has been provided below for your convenience.
Rotatable Technologies has listed six other companies in the lawsuit including Callvine, Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Netflix, Inc., Quickoffice, Inc., Target Corporation and Whole Foods Market, Inc.
The case was filed in the United States District Court for Eastern Texas, Marshall Division. No Judge is noted as being assigned to this case.
Patently Apple presents only a brief summary of certain legal cases/ lawsuits which are part of the public record for journalistic news purposes. Readers are cautioned that Patently Apple does not offer an opinion on the merit of the case and strictly presents the allegations made in said legal cases / lawsuits. A lawyer should be consulted for any further details or analysis. About Comments: Patently Apple reserves the right to post, dismiss or edit comments. On most legal cases, comments will be closed. See our Legal Archives for other patent infringement cases.
Sites Covering our Original Report
MacSurfer, Twitter, Facebook, Apple Investor News, Google Reader, Macnews, iPhone World Canada, MacDailyNews, and more.
anybody remember the Radius Pivot Display from perhaps the early 90s? You could turn a monitor and the display reconfigured itself from horizontal to vertical. only two possibilities though.
check it out here
Posted by: juanm | May 20, 2012 at 08:00 AM
As one of the named parties to this case, we're at least happy to be in the esteemed company of Apple, Whole Foods, Netflix and others. But this is just one more example of a patent system that is out of control - so now we must hire patent lawyers to defend a completely frivolous case (in our opinion)?
Rudy Prince, CEO
Posted by: Rudy Prince | May 17, 2012 at 08:20 AM
I kinda think rotating images of any content on a screen was done with television back in the 50's. Rotating images of any content digitally was slow but straightforward back in the 80's. Just take a display list and apply a rotation about a coordinate. The controls about the frame are just graphics and would be affected by display list rotation as much as the window content area, they only factor into things when you're interacting with them using a touch panel or a pointing device. I suppose it is possible that Xerox Parc hadn't messed with this by the late 70's.
Posted by: Mike | May 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM
The only problem is that iOS does not use windows!
Each apps is full screen, so the entire OS rotates, not the window.
Posted by: yoshipod | May 16, 2012 at 08:25 PM
Thanks for the humor AppleFUD! That's hillarious.
Posted by: Kelly | May 16, 2012 at 01:58 PM
frackin apple. . . bunch of copycats, can't they innovate anything? do they always have to rip off others?!?!?!
Posted by: AppleFUD | May 16, 2012 at 01:35 PM
This entire patent relies upon the Window Server and Drawing Composite Engine to produce the desired effect which requires the OS to manage the views and thus requires Apple patented work long before hand.
Posted by: Marc Driftmeyer | May 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM
True John, but Trolls have been known to win many cases. It's like the lottery for lawyers. Take a chance, who knows?
Posted by: Bone | May 16, 2012 at 12:05 PM
East Texas dispute filing = Troll
Posted by: John Date | May 16, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Hi Oscar, any time you go from landscape to portrait on an iPad, you're rotating the window. So it's relevant.
Posted by: George | May 16, 2012 at 10:11 AM
The weird thing about this patent is the "freely chosen" rotation angle. The old displays rotated 90 degrees (landscape to portrait for full page viewing) but I never saw a monitor or OS that rotated a window at anything other than 90 degrees (never saw one rotate 180 degrees). Looking at the patent, I wonder if it applies to iOS devices since they don't use any of the following means to rotate the window:
selectively rotating comprises a rotation button.
selectively rotating comprises a menu command.
selectively rotating comprises a key stroke.
selectively rotating comprises a rotation cursor.
Posted by: robert | May 16, 2012 at 10:11 AM
What Apple product has rotatable windows like that? Why would you even want to rotate a window like they show.
Object have been rotatable like that since the MacPaint/MacDraw days.
Posted by: Oscar Hasten | May 16, 2012 at 10:09 AM
Didn't Radius Pivot monitors do this back in the 1980s?
Here is a demo from Computer Chronicles:
Posted by: Jeff Garner | May 16, 2012 at 09:38 AM
Patent filed in 1999 so probably why.
Will be interesting to see of there's prior patents or usage to the patent.
Posted by: Tom | May 16, 2012 at 09:31 AM
It's interesting that this illustration is clearly a Mac OS window from before OS X. I wonder why?
Posted by: Ian Kirkland | May 16, 2012 at 08:38 AM