« Apple to Ship More than 40 Million iPhone's for the Holiday Quarter, Ranks Third in Online Movie Biz & Reveals New Camera Related Patent and More | Main | Apple Given 48 Hours to Correct their Apology to Samsung »

November 01, 2012

Comments

The fact that the '403 patent was cited as relevant prior art, but then the '632 patent was still issued clearly means that whatever objections the examiner came up with were overcome by Microsoft. At least, it means that the claims in '632 are novel even in the light of '403.

It would be more worrying for Microsoft if the '403 patent were *not* cited in their '632 patent, as Surfcast could claim that they should have known about it and disclosed it to the examiner.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Follow PatentlyApple on Twitter