« Apple Reveals Dual OLED Backlights are destined for Future iPad | Main | Apple Files Launchpad Icon TM in China + iWeb TM Challenged »

November 10, 2011

Comments

Don't you just love to see a head explode. Gizmodo's rant is so off the wall stupid that you have to worry about the guy. But that crazy photo with the 10 hand beast should win hands down for the creepiest, craziest, funiest photo ever.

When I look at Figure 18, it's so simple what Apple is proposing that's it's not even funny. Critics trying to complicate this should have their heads examined.

@ Patrick

Thanks for your asinine interpretation of a blip in time. I think that intelligent people understand the difference between protectable Intellectual Property and the notion that creators of art or designers of tech are always borrowing one idea to spin off another like a movie "concept." When Apple created the iPod, there were MP3 players on the market. Apple built one that had a clickwheel, played playlists created on iTunes and allowed you to buy music at the best online music store in the world to fill your iPod. Did Apple's IP go far beyond the original idea. Yes, of course. Is it stealing? Not a chance in hell.

So if it makes your simpleton mind feel that Steve Jobs is a hypocrite, then be stupid. You're just an Androider. A Google robot who can't think beyond their nose. Ha!

To quote Jobs: "It's wrong to steal. It hurts other people. And it hurts your own character."

To quote Jobs again: "We've always been shameless about stealing great ideas."

In other words, Jobs and Apple are in the business of knowingly stealing, hurting people, and denigrating their character. Jobs said so himself!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Follow PatentlyApple on Twitter