« Tritton Technologies Files Patent Infringement Case Against Apple | Main | LED iPod Touch with Video Cam & FaceTime Fulfills Major Patents »

September 01, 2010

Comments

@ Marc, and what's wrong with a wireless headset? I hate iPod earbud wires!They're always tangled. A clip on means that you have to unclip it to make a selection. Why is that better than a watch that's angled right for you to see the UI instantly. On a treadmill I'd rather have a watch. To each his own.

If I'm working out I don't want a watch with a cable running to my ears as I'm on the tread mill.

On a clip to my shirt I can work out with my arms free.

If you expect everyone to have wireless ear-buds you're crazy.

Even a day after the event, I have to admit, the ipod nano was destroyed. Just like apple erred in taking out the button in the shuffle, crashing the size of the display in the iPod nano is crazy. As a watch, it would be cool. As a media player it's way too small and dinky. Maybe they're aiming at K12'ers or something because male adults will view this as just stupid.

If I want a workout device, the shuffle is all you need. So the nano, not replacing the shuffle, loses the camera and size. That just stupid. Top that off with no iPod Classic and you're being forced to get an iPod touch for the features. I get dropping the Classic, but not destroying the nano.

The faster they get the nano into a watch and strap format the better. Just my 2 cents.

All it needs to make it into a watch is a strap that integrates with the clip, then its a winner. I'm sure the 3rd part accessory people are working on bringing us just such a strap right now.

Will be the #1 stocking stuffer this Xmas!

Does it come with bluetooth?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Follow PatentlyApple on Twitter